Women’s Language Features Used by Women Across Different Public Roles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v5i2.253Keywords:
women’s language features, professional public roles, female public figuresAbstract
Since the rise of the second wave of feminist movement, the contribution of women in professional fields has significantly increased. As women occupy these public roles, studies found that they can still adopt the distinct language, which Lakoff (1975) termed as women's language features. This research aimed to compare and analyze the use of these features among four popular professional public roles in the United States, namely, politician, businesswoman, lawyer, and artist. Furthermore, four figures are selected with consideration of one representative per each role. The figures were Kamala Harris, Indra Nooyi, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Selena Gomez, respectively. A qualitative method was employed, using interview transcripts and audio from YouTube videos. The analysis included all ten recognized features, such as lexical hedges, tag questions, intensifiers, empty adjectives, and others. These features were identified through close reading of the transcripts and careful listening to the audio, then categorized based on the original framework. The findings showed that there were variations in the frequency of feature occurrences across the roles. Moreover, the tendencies appeared to functioned the women's language features as a deliberate way to meet job requirements.
References
Arviani, C., & Sikumbang, A. T. (2024). Gender and Cultural Representation in the Film Yuni. eScience Humanity Journal, 4(2), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v4i2.128
Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., … Abadi, H. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. CV. Pustaka Ilmu.
Boldyrev, N. N., & Dubrovskaya, O. G. (2016). Sociocultural Specificity of Discourse: The Interpretive Approach to Language Use. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 236, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.12.019
Conger, J. A. (1998). The Necessary Art of Persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 76, 84–97.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Joseph, B. C., Hartanti, L. P., & Leliana, A. (2021). The Use of Women’s Language Features by Kamala Harris in the Vice-presidential Debate: Presented at the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021), Surabaya, Indonesia. Surabaya, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.050
Kasimbara, D. C. (2022). The Struggle of Women Existence In “Isn’t It Romantic” Novel By Wendy Wesserstein. eScience Humanity Journal, 2(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v2i1.28
Kruse, K. R. (2009). Lawyers in character and lawyers in role. Nev. LJ, 10, 393.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and Woman’s Place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80.
Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
Malik, M. (2020). The Distinction Between The Terms Sex and Gender. In Sex and Cardiac Electrophysiology (pp. 3–4). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817728-0.00001-2
Pearson, J. C. (1985). Gender and Communication. Dubuque, Iowa: W.C. Brown Publishers.
Sarapik, V. (2017). Ideology and Art. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi, 26(01+ 02), 7–14.
Scarborough, W. J., Sin, R., & Risman, B. (2019). Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism, Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 through 2016. Gender & Society, 33(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218809604
Suhesty, A., & Sriyono, S. (2023). Women’s Language Features in The Podcast Stories of The Soul. Prosodi, 17(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v17i1.19613
Surya Adi, P. P., Mulyawan, I. W., & Santi Indriyani, K. (2022). Women’s Language Features Used by Taylor Swift in the 2015 Grammy Interview Video. Pustaka : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Budaya, 22(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.24843/PJIIB.2022.v22.i02.p09
Zacharias, F. C. (2008). Effects of Reputation on the Legal Profession. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 65, 173.
