Chaos in a Pro-Life Event: An Analysis of Negative Impoliteness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v4i2.92Kata Kunci:
ketidaksopanan negatif, sosiolinguistik, pro-life.Abstrak
Acara Pro-life yang diadakan Student for Life berubah ricuh. Fenomena ini dapat dikaitkan dengan terjadinya strategi ketidaksopanan negatif yang menyerang keinginan negatif seseorang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi dan fungsi ketidaksopanan negatif dalam peristiwa tersebut. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan teknik observasi dan non partisipatif dalam pengumpulan datanya. Data dianalisis mengunakan teori Culpeper (1996, 2011) untuk mengetahui strategi ketidaksopanan negatif dan fungsinya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat strategi ketidaksopanan negatif yang dilakukan oleh khalayak pro-choice untuk menakut-nakuti, merendahkan, mengejek, mencemooh, menyerang, mengasosiasikan secara eksplisit dengan aspek negatif, dan menghalangi pembicara dan anggota pro-kehidupan, yang berfungsi sebagai koersif dan afektif. ketidaksopanan, akibatnya membuat acara menjadi kacau. Mereka tahu dan mampu bersikap sopan, namun memutuskan untuk tidak melakukannya. Terlepas dari argumen tersebut, kedua belah pihak seharusnya bersikap profesional dan dewasa.
Referensi
Acheampong, D. O., Kwarteng, M., & others. (2021). A pragmatic analysis of impoliteness in selected Ghanaian social interactions. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 32–40.
Ardila, J. A. G. (2019). Impoliteness as a rhetorical strategy in Spain’s politics. Journal of Pragmatics, 140, 160–170.
Betzig, L., & Lombardo, L. H. (1992). Who’s pro-choice and why. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13(1), 49–71.
Borris, D., & Zecho, C. (2018). The linguistic politeness having seen on the current study issue. Linguistics and Culture Review, 2(1), 32–44.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence (Vol. 28). Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J. (2016). Impoliteness strategies. Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, 421–445.
Culpeper, J. (2021). Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 4–11.
Culpeper, J., & Tantucci, V. (2021). The principle of (im) politeness reciprocity. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 146–164.
Graham, S. L. (2007). Disagreeing to agree: Conflict,(im) politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 742–759.
Harris, L. H. (2008). Second trimester abortion provision: breaking the silence and changing the discourse. Reproductive Health Matters, 16(31), 74–81.
Hendricks, P. (2019). Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is Immoral: the impairment argument. Bioethics, 33(2), 245–253.
Hendricks, P. (2023). The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral. Journal of Medical Ethics.
Kadhum, M. F., & Abbas, N. F. (2021). How Impoliteness Is Portrayed in a School Context:" The Marva Collins" as a Case Study. Arab World English Journal, 12(3), 144–158.
Khazraie, M., & Talebzadeh, H. (2020). “Wikipedia does NOT tolerate your babbling!”: Impoliteness-induced conflict (resolution) in a polylogal collaborative online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 163, 46–65.
Kienpointner, M. (2008). Impoliteness and emotional arguments.
Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 217–244.
Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (2006). Social exchange theory of emotions. Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, 295–320.
Lee, P. (2004). The pro-life argument from substantial identity: A defence. Bioethics, 18(3), 249–263.
Locher, M. A., & Bousfield, D. (2008). Introduction: Impoliteness and power in language (Issue 21). Mouton de Gruyter.
Lopez, R. (2012). Perspectives on Abortion: Pro-Choice, Pro-Life, and What Lies in between. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27(4), 511–517.
Maha, L. (2014). Cross-cultural perspectives on linguistic politeness. Cross-Cultural Communication, 10(1), 56–60.
Minoo, A., & Ashkan, L. (2019). The Realization of Impoliteness in Arguments between the Democrats and Republicans over the Government Shutdown Issue in the US. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(1), 83–97.
Nasirli, A. (2021). An analysis of linguistic impoliteness in the selected American movies. Dünya Dilleri, Edebiyatlar{i} ve Çeviri Çal{i}{c{s}}malar{i} Dergisi, 2(1), 11–31.
Parvaresh, V., & Tayebi, T. (2018). Impoliteness, aggression and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 91–107.
Sahib, R., Zulihi, Z., Maloga, A., Zulfadli, Z., Nasrulloh, L., & Junaiddin, J. (2023). Politeness strategies used by Papuan students in virtual communication practices at university. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 10(2).
Sari, I. P., Emmiyati, N., & Asnur, S. M. (2019). Impoliteness strategies in Peter Rabbit movie. Elite: English and Literature Journal, 6(2), 222–237.
Sifianou, M. (2012). Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1554–1564.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005). (Im) Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: unpackaging their bases and interrelationships.
Sudaryanto, S. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa : Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.
