Implikatur Percakapan dalam Tayangan “ Tiga Bacapres Bicara Gagasan”

Authors

  • Dairi Sapta Rindu Simanjuntak Universitas Katholik Santo Thomas, Medan, Indonesia
  • Eka Putri Saptari Wulan Universitas HKBP Nommensen
  • Gustianingsih Gustianingsih Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v4i2.88

Keywords:

Implicature, Conversation, Pragmatics

Abstract

The context of conversation in a discourse, especially political discourse which is currently trending, is very interesting to discuss. The context of conversation in pragmatics studies can be observed from the concept of implicature. Therefore, this research aims to explore the form of implicature utterances and the meaning of implicatures contained in the dialogue between the 2024 presidential candidates on the "3 Presidential Candidates Talk Ideas" program hosted by Najwa Shihab. This research uses a qualitative approach with content analysis method. The data source is a conversation video obtained from the YouTube channel. The research data is in the form of speech spoken by the speakers and presenters. Data presentation is carried out using an interactive model, namely data collection, data reduction, data verification and drawing conclusions. The findings of this research are that there are 14 implicature utterance data in the conversation. Implicature utterances are used by each presidential candidate. Even though implicature speech is used in the dialogue, the conversation still runs smoothly because both speakers understand the context and meaning of the speech being conveyed. The most important thing that determines the success of utterers in understanding the meaning and context of each utterance is the existence of similar experiences or perceptions even though it is not stated explicitly.

References

Atchison, J. (1992:104). Linguistics. British Library.

Bachari, Andika Dutha. (2017). Pragmatik: Analisis Penggunaan Bahasa. Bandung: SPS Prodi Linguistik UPI

Brown, P. &. (1987). Politenes: Some universal in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Chaer, A. (2012). Linguistik Umum. Bandung: Rineka Cipta.

Djajasudarma., T. F. (2012). Wacana dan Pragmatik. Bandung: Yrama Media.

Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics, Implicature, Presuppasition, and Logical Form. England: Academic Press. Grice, H. (1975). Logic and Conversation. University London Hadiati.

Levinson, C. Stephen. 1997. Pragmatics. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press

Nababan, P.W.J. 1987. Ilmu Pragmatik (Teori dan Penerapannya). Jakarta: Depdikbud Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Mujiyono Wiryationo.1996. Implikatur Prcakapan Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. Malang: IKIP Malang

Pratamanti, E. D. (2021: 21). Implikatur pada Meme Islam di Instagram Sebagai Wujud Digitalisasi Media Dakwah: Kajian Pragmatik. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 22-37.

Schiffin, D. (1994: 190). Aprroaches to Discourse. Oxford. Blackwell Publicsher.

Simanjuntak, D. S. (2017). Analisis Implikatur Wacana Percakapan Dalam Novel"Masih Ada Hari Esok" Karya Daniel Steel. Jurnal Basis (Bahasa danSastra Inggris), 1-10.

Sobur, A. (2012). Analisis Teks Media. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wijana, I. D. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Yuma Pustaka.

Yule, George. 2006. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yuniatu, I. (2020). Implikatur Dalam Wacana Kampanye Pemilihan Legislatif 2019 Jurnal KIBASP (Kajian Bahasa. Sastra dan Pengajaran), 277-288

Downloads

Published

2024-05-28

How to Cite

Simanjuntak, D. S. R., Wulan, E. P. S. ., & Gustianingsih, G. . (2024). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Tayangan “ Tiga Bacapres Bicara Gagasan” . EScience Humanity Journal, 4(2), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v4i2.88

Issue

Section

eScience Humanity Journal Volume 4 Number 2 may 2024